![]() In addition, pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 and supporting regulations, Princeton does not discriminate on the basis of sex in the education programs or activities that it operates this extends to admission and employment. In applying this policy, the University is committed to nondiscrimination on the basis of personal beliefs or characteristics such as political views, religion, national or ethnic origin, race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, pregnancy, age, marital or domestic partnership status, veteran status, disability, genetic information and/or other characteristics protected by applicable law in any phase of its education or employment programs or activities. Open to Princeton students, faculty, visiting scholars and specially invited guests.Įqual Opportunity and Nondiscrimination at Princeton University: Princeton University believes that commitment to principles of fairness and respect for all is favorable to the free and open exchange of ideas, and the University seeks to reach out as widely as possible in order to attract the ablest individuals as students, faculty, and staff. Nicolás Sánchez-Rodríguez, Cotsen Postdoctoral Fellow in the Society of Fellows Lecturer in the Council of the Humanities and Spanish and Portuguese, Princeton University Alejandra Laera, Universidad de Buenos Airesĭr. Ericka Beckman, University of Pennsylvaniaĭr. In a fruitful engagement with gender theory, the scholarship on racial capitalism, and decolonial approaches, they have also underlined the central part played by political economy – as a discipline and practice of government – in the production of class, race, and gender subjectivities that have historically enabled the extraction of surplus value.ĭr. They draw from Dependency Theory, neo-Keynesianism, and the Marxist traditions that shaped the field in the 1970s and 1980s, but they take these scholarships on new and productive intellectual paths through a renewed engagement with categories like primitive accumulation, logistics, fictitious capital, turnover time, coloniality, uneven development, value, and crisis. Troubled by the increased naturalization of extractivism and neoclassical theories during the neoliberal age, these body of works have provided a new critique of political economy through an engagement with the Latin American archive. In addition to a shared methodological approach that combines literary and economic analysis, the trait that distinguishes these studies is a concern with understanding the specificity of capitalism in Latin America. Rethinking the role of aesthetics and narrative structures within the history of capitalism, they provide a nuanced outlook on the economic discourses and apparatuses that have defined capital accumulation in the region. This event brings together prominent scholars of what can be described as the economic turn in Latin American Cultural Studies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |